Olympique de Marseille endured a disastrous night in Auxerre, suffering a heavy 3-0 defeat in Ligue 1. However, beyond the disappointing performance, the spotlight quickly turned to the heated criticism of referee Jérémy Stinat, especially following the controversial red card shown to Derek Cornelius.
Club advisor Fabrizio Ravanelli and head coach Roberto De Zerbi voiced their frustration, accusing the officials of unfair decisions, including a denied penalty and the sending-off of Cornelius. But it was club president Pablo Longoria who escalated tensions, openly accusing the referees of “outright corruption” and even suggesting Marseille could leave Ligue 1 if invited to join the Super League.
These explosive accusations triggered an immediate response from French Football Federation (FFF) president Philippe Diallo, who condemned the remarks as “unacceptable.” The referees’ union (SAFE) also reacted strongly, rejecting all corruption claims and announcing legal action for defamation and threats made against match officials.
Death Threats Spark Legal Action
“No, Mr. Longoria, French referees are not corrupt! Losing a match does not justify questioning the integrity of officials. Accusing them of organized corruption is not only defamatory but also shows a lack of understanding of their work and commitment to football. This puts all referees, both professional and amateur, in harm’s way, with serious consequences. SAFE cannot accept this and has decided to refer the matter to the National Ethics Committee. Complaints will be filed for defamation and against those responsible for the hate messages and death threats received since last night,” read the official SAFE statement.
This latest clash between OM and French officiating is set to further fuel debates about fairness in Ligue 1 and the handling of refereeing decisions.
